Strangles

A strategy consisting of the purchase or sale of both a call option and a put option with the same expiration date but different strike prices. A long strangle offers an opportunity to make money when a stock or index moves substantially. A short strangle offers an opportunity to make money when a stock or index stays within a range.

Long Strangles

Long strangles may allow an investor to profit from dramatic price movements in a specific security or index. An investor might employ a long strangle when he expects a substantial movement by the security but is unsure of the direction. Long strangles involve the simultaneous purchase of both call options and put options with the same expiration date but different strike prices, typically ‘out-of-the-money’.

The investor may benefit from either a large increase or a large decrease in the price of the stock. However, the stock must move further than the total premium paid either: higher than the call strike, or lower than the put strike for the investor to profit at expiration.

Prior to expiration, if the underlying security moves substantially up or down, the investor may choose to realize a profit by selling the in-the-money option before its expiration date. In this case, while the in-the-money option will have been losing time value since it was purchased, the losses in time premium are offset by the gains in intrinsic value.

The investor may continue to hold the out-of -the-money option for the possibility to participate in any further, opposite movement by the security.

However, there is no guarantee the out of the money option would retain a high premium even with an increase in volatility. Rather than selling following a dramatic price move, the investor can continue to hold both options until expiration - anticipating even more dramatic price movements in the future. However, unless such movements do occur, time decay will eventually take its toll on both options' premiums.

For use when investor anticipates:

Financial Characteristics:

Objective:

EXAMPLE - Long Strangle

Short Strangles

Investors using the short strangle strategy anticipate that the underlying security of the options will trade in a range and that larger movements in either direction are unlikely. A short strangle will typically, therefore, involve the simultaneous sale of both call options and put options with the same expiration date but different strike prices, typically ‘out-of-the-money’. The investor receives the premiums for the calls and puts and hopes that, at expiration, neither the calls nor the puts will be more in-the-money than the total premium received. The strategy exposes the investor to unlimited losses with the possibility of only limited profits. The investor might also sell a strangle using strikes that he/she expects the underlying security to move between by expiration.

For use when investor anticipates:

Financial Characteristics:

Objective:

 

EXAMPLE - Short Strangle

 

Commissions, taxes, and transaction costs are not included in any of these strategy discussions, but can affect final outcome and should be considered. Please contact a tax advisor to discuss the tax implications of these strategies. Many of the strategies described herein require the use of a margin account. With long options, investors may lose 100% of funds invested. In-the-money long puts need to be closed out prior to expiration, since exercising them could create short stock positions.

Options carry a high level of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Certain requirements must be met to trade options through Schwab. Multiple leg options strategies will involve multiple commissions. Please read the options disclosure document titled "Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options." Member SIPC

 

Options carry a high level of risk and are not suitable for all investors. Certain requirements must be met to trade options through Schwab. Multiple leg options strategies will involve multiple commissions. Please read the options disclosure document titled "Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options." Member SIPC